|
|
|
|
sisters
Author: Memento
|
|
(Added on Apr 21, 2008)
(This month 63668 readers) (Total 84712 readers) |
|
|
Ratings and Reviews: |
Number
of Ratings: 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
50% |
0% |
25% |
0% |
0% |
25% |
|
Weighed
Average (?): (6.5/10) |
Average
Rating: (7/10) |
Highest
Rating: (10/10) |
Lowest
Rating: (5/10) |
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
JimmyJump
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 15, 2012 |
|
Either Memento has re-submitted "sisters" in a revised version, or the former reviewers have collectively been chewing the wrong kind of mushrooms. For there is nothing wrong with "sisters" -bar seemingly staying unfinished. On the contrary, I found the story to be well written with lots of detail to spelling and syntax. In fact, I could find only two errors in the text... Seems to me the first reviewer wasn't in the mood and the next two simply howled with the wolf. Beats me... Excellent short, which I would like to see continued still -if indeed it was Memento's intention to continue. Could be just one of these ideas, a flash of inspiration which was put down to paper as an essay, an experiment.... who knows? JJ (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Sep 2, 2008 |
|
needs editing, proof reading and a synopsis would be nice also (5/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
kinkcrazy
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 30, 2008 |
|
Very poorly written (5/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
masterdw
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 28, 2008 |
|
I would have rated it higher but poor editing and use of pronouns made it more confusing than it shoud have been. Be careful when you continue and I will be glad to rerate. I would enjoy more of the initial training. (7/10)
|
|
|