|
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 8 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 13% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
13% |
0% |
38% |
38% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (8/10) |
Average
Rating:  (8.5/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (10/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (1/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Victor
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jun 29, 2011 |
| |
A story I could not put down. Had to read it in one go. (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
fallenstar
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Mar 6, 2009 |
| |
I Love this story! I keep coming back for more. I've spent many nights staying up wanting to reread it! Very well written. I was a little worried at the start but as the plot line shifted I became more and more entranced! Nice job Sbbe! (10/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
StillBehindBlueEyes
(Edit) (Mar 6, 2009)
- You have just made my day! Thank you so much Fallenstar. Hugs
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
JimmyJump
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 28, 2009 |
| |
Well, contrary to Roger Daltrey, you know what it's like to be behind blue eyes, heh?
Okay, review time.
"Training Of Shauna" works extremely well, because of the fact the author doesn't let her speak, at least, not often.
That way, we tend to read the story from an animal's perspective. A sentient animal, which understand all that is happening, but is unable to respond in a proper way, because, well, she's an animal.
On the other hand, Sbbe does a magnifico job in painting Shauna's behaviour, reactions and to a certain extent her feelings, through the reactions and dialogue of the people tormenting her, which again adds to the 'non-human' feel of the 'subject'.
Like I said before, I'm a sucker for human pet stories, especially when they are very well wtritten, as "Shauna" clearly is.
So, maybe I'm a tad biased, but regardless of the flaws and irksome lay-out, I grant his tale a certified tenner.
JJ (10/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
StillBehindBlueEyes
(Edit) (Jan 28, 2009)
- LOL Again, I love it, "works extremely well, because of the fact the author doesn't let her speak, at least, not often."
The entire pet idea makes my knees weak. The thought of being completely controlled down to the tinest detail is so sexy.
Thanks for the great comments.
Sbbe
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Ruby
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jun 10, 2006 |
| |
It's an interesting tale and made all the better by the "pet" getting a happy ending in what could have been a non-consensual horror story.
I gave it a seven, because the organization of the story makes it difficult to follow. Chapter breaks or more transitional phrases would help the reader know when the story has moved from once scene to the next. Knowing which character is speaking is also difficult at times.
---
If you update it, let me know and I'll re-rate the new version. (7/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
StillBehindBlueEyes
(Edit) (Jun 10, 2006)
- Thanks for the kind words and the helpful one's too. I find my work here very hard to edit. I get swept away by the emotions. I'll try again to edit it. Gosh who would have thought I'd get so many Grammer comments on a porn site. Giggle!
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
petleah
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 26, 2006 |
| |
After reading Shauna and Little Flower's tales I'm extremely impressed with your talent as a writer. I gave this entry a 9/10 because there were more grammatical/spelling errors than in the other (length taken into account) and there were a few plot holes that left me saying "huh? ...wait a second..." However, overall it is a fantastic story that I will thoroughly enjoy re-reading many times. (9/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
StillBehindBlueEyes
(Edit) (Jan 26, 2006)
- :-) Thanks, What plot holes? Honestly I find it very hard to edit this work. My Vanilla is much easier. I just get carried away. Hope you get carried away many times by it. I'd accept a revised version and give you credit for the help.
Stillbehindblueeyes (at) yahoo (dot) com
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
isabeau
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 25, 2006 |
| |
i loved this story, the plot left me mesmerized. i found myself coming back to the computer time after time to finish this wonderfully creative piece of work. i never knew that pets were treated better than slaves. this is only the second story i have read, dealing with pets. the details and descriptions were terrific, and i so loved Shauna. excellent i highly recommend this story. (10/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
StillBehindBlueEyes
(Edit) (Jan 25, 2006)
- Thank you so much. As a writer it's my universe so pet's are precious. Try my other Little Flower is a pet too.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
haralambosx
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 24, 2006 |
| |
i liked it very much hard and cruel at the beggining
but nice and romantic at the end the main charachter
(shauna) really get's you going. In my opinion a very good story. (9/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
StillBehindBlueEyes
(Edit) (Jan 25, 2006)
- Thank you. I enjoy both types also. See if you like my other story as well. It's much shorter.
Sbbe
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
chooky_104
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 23, 2006 |
| |
Story didn't download. Perhaps a problem with the site, but other stories were ok tonight. (1/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
StillBehindBlueEyes
(Edit) (Jan 23, 2006)
- Please try again and realize it's real big, over 100,000 words. It might be real slow. Sbbe
- Replied by:
StillBehindBlueEyes
(Edit) (Jan 25, 2006)
- Have you tried again? I sure would like this 1/2 star gone. :-)
- Replied by:
JimmyJump
(Edit) (Jan 28, 2009)
- So, because the "story didn't download", you decide to give a one score?
Do you always rate stories you didn't read?
When a new book isn't at the stores yet, do you give that a low score?
What gives you the right to screw-up a story's rating because it "didn't download"?
It's been three years since your little stunt, have you been trying all that time?
My guess is you have a PC that dates from the stone age and has difficulty downloading everything above 2Kb... as a consequence, I rate your PC 0.25/10.
And your charming little personality as 0.001/10.
Howzat feel, chook...
Shame on you.
JJ
|
|
|
About 