|
|
|
|
|
Vicki's Request
Author: Golffdude
|
| |
(Added on Feb 6, 2004)
(This month 31896 readers) (Total 56192 readers) |
| |
Vicki's Request |
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 5 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
20% |
20% |
40% |
20% |
0% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (7.5/10) |
Average
Rating:  (8/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (9/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (6/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 1, 2008 |
| |
a synopsis would have been nice, the story it self was ok, nothing of sexual shock nature , but still good (7/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
bdsmbill
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 9, 2004 |
| |
I thought this was very interesting. Unlike a previous reviewer, I didn't think switching to the wife's point of view added anything to the story, however, and there were some minor spelling and grammar problems, but overall, I thought it was a fun read with interesting characters. I did think it ended a bit abruptly, however. (8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
lex ludite
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 8, 2004 |
| |
This one had absolutely no suspense. It had plenty of background and buildup, perhaps too much for this reader's taste. The idea of fulfilling his wife's articulated fantasy was fine and the details and actual execution were well organized. However this was a "by the numbers" exercise. There was no tension developed between any of the characters. The story just ran on and then ended, was that all there was? I would have liked to know if the wife was now a confirmed devotee of the furry side of the street, did she suffer any mental anguish, was she up for another round of fun and games? That would have been great and probably made a better sequel than the original story. Others have mentioned the spell check issue, so enough on that subject. However some of the sentences and the dialogue between characters violated many of the fundamental laws of grammar and construction. Perhaps the spell check issue was just a ruse to cover the other more significant grammatical weaknesses of the story? (Only a joke, relax.) The bottom line is that the author can write, but there is a lot more to the subject that putting words to paper. (6/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Wyn
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 7, 2004 |
| |
It's a pretty good story. Alternating between the two main characters made the story more interesting.
The synopsis didn't give much detail and neither did the story codes; an example would be bestiality for those who aren't into it. Having a proof-reader probably could've helped with the spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors. For some readers, homonyms will make them stop, backup and re-read again, detracting from the flow of the story.
(8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
e.e. norcod
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 6, 2004 |
| |
A very, very good story. Normally I am not into abduction and rape stories (c.p. is my bag) but this fantasy is an exception. The strongest point is the alternating points of view and the ways in which they are used to get into the mind set of the submissive. All in all the story offers an interesting twist in that the entire scenerio is actually initiated by the sub. This contrasts nicely with the usual clumsy abduction scenerio's. I suspect that this story should become a favorite of female subs who are into abduction scenerios.
The only real negative I can identify is the "Curse of Spelcheck". There are words that sound fairly close to the word you intend and that are spelled correctly but have a different meaning than the one that you intend. Because they are spelled correctly you spelling program passes over them. Have a second person read the story before you submit it to pick these errors up. (9/10)
|
|
|
About 